July 15, 2014 Journal article Open Access

Giannouli, Antonia

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.25592/uhhfdm.605</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Giannouli, Antonia</creatorName>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Byzantine punctuation and orthography. Between normalisation and respect of the manuscripts. Introductory remarks</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Universität Hamburg</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Manuscript Studies</subject>
    <subject>Byzantine Studies</subject>
    <subject>Philology</subject>
    <subject>Text criticism</subject>
    <subject>Punctuation</subject>
    <subject>Scribal practice</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2014-07-15</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://www.fdr.uni-hamburg.de/record/605</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsPartOf">10.25592/uhhfdm.604</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;The tendencies of Byzantine authors and scribes with regard to punctuation, orthography or accentuation, based on such trustworthy witnesses as an autograph, a copy corrected or dictated by the author himself, have been the subject of individual analyses or integrated into editions. Yet, modern editors still waver between their normalization and their adoption.&amp;nbsp;On the one hand, this diversity in editorial principles points to the need for a systematic study of authorial and scribal habits and their evolution throughout the Byzantine period. On the other, an ever more urgent issue is how the results of such a study would affect textual criticism and editing techniques. The observations outlined below apply to literary texts, written in prose and in learned language.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>