July 15, 2014 Journal article Open Access

Giannouli, Antonia

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;The tendencies of Byzantine authors and scribes with regard to punctuation, orthography or accentuation, based on such trustworthy witnesses as an autograph, a copy corrected or dictated by the author himself, have been the subject of individual analyses or integrated into editions. Yet, modern editors still waver between their normalization and their adoption.&amp;nbsp;On the one hand, this diversity in editorial principles points to the need for a systematic study of authorial and scribal habits and their evolution throughout the Byzantine period. On the other, an ever more urgent issue is how the results of such a study would affect textual criticism and editing techniques. The observations outlined below apply to literary texts, written in prose and in learned language.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20190828105452.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.25592/uhhfdm.605</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="n">July</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">18-22</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">8</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Comparative Oriental Manuscript Studies Newsletter</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2014-07-15</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">605</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:fdr.uni-hamburg.de:605</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-uhh</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Byzantine punctuation and orthography. Between normalisation and respect of the manuscripts. Introductory remarks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.25592/uhhfdm.604</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">270113</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://www.fdr.uni-hamburg.de/record/605/files/COMSt_Newsletter_8_2014-1822-Giannouli.pdf</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:c1acfe6e43cdf3515a2e611fa57f1655</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Manuscript Studies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Byzantine Studies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Philology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Text criticism</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Punctuation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Scribal practice</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Giannouli, Antonia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-uhh</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>