Journal article Open Access
Longacre, Drew
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
<leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
<datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Longacre, Drew</subfield>
<subfield code="u">Qumran Institute, University of Groningen</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a"><p>Writing is an expression of culture and is subject to intercultural influences. In this&nbsp;comparative study, I argue that Egyptian and Judean Hebrew/Aramaic scripts from&nbsp;400 BCE&ndash;400 CE were heavily influenced by Greek and later Latin writing cultures,&nbsp;which explains many previously inexplicable phenomena. Jewish writers in the third&nbsp;century BCE adopted the Greek split-nibbed reed pen, which dramatically changed&nbsp;the appearance of Hebrew/Aramaic scripts. At the same time, the normal size for Hebrew/&nbsp;Aramaic scripts shrank considerably, the pen strokes became mostly monotone&nbsp;and unshaded, and the scripts became more rectilinear, angular, bilinear, and square.<br>
Each of these features appears to be due to direct imitation of contemporary Greek&nbsp;formal writing. Beginning in the first century BCE, Hebrew/Aramaic writers began to&nbsp;decorate their formal scripts with separate ornamental strokes like those of contemporary&nbsp;Greek and Latin calligraphic scripts. And from the second or third century CE,<br>
Hebrew/Aramaic calligraphic scripts seem to be increasingly characterized by horizontal&nbsp;shading, parallel to the contemporary rise of Greek and Latin shaded scripts.&nbsp;Furthermore, in the late Roman period, the traditional Hieratic-derived Aramaic numeral&nbsp;system was replaced by an alphabetic numeral system under the influence of&nbsp;the Greek Milesian alphabetic numerals.</p></subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
<subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
<subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.25592/uhhfdm.8897</subfield>
<subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
<subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="s">11789070</subfield>
<subfield code="u">https://www.fdr.uni-hamburg.de/record/9156/files/longacre.pdf</subfield>
<subfield code="z">md5:61d50771d642d57a4c0448fb78fe45fa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="l">open</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Comparative Hellenistic and Roman Manuscript Studies (CHRoMS): Script Interactions and Hebrew/Aramaic Writing Culture</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">10.25592/uhhfdm.9156</subfield>
<subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
</datafield>
<controlfield tag="005">20220128173619.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="001">9156</controlfield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2021-03-01</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
<subfield code="o">oai:fdr.uni-hamburg.de:9156</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Manuscript studies</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Palaeography</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Hebrew</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
<subfield code="n">1</subfield>
<subfield code="c">7-50</subfield>
<subfield code="v">7</subfield>
<subfield code="p">Comparative Oriental Manuscript Studies Bulletin</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
<subfield code="b">article</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>